Budget cuts across the board
Queen’s will be experiencing a 15 per cent budget cut over the next three academic years. In an e-mail to faculty on Nov. 15, Principal Tom Williams announced a 15 per cent budget cut will be applied to all faculties and units of the University, including the administration, starting in the 2009-10 academic year. (back to story...)
Discuss this story (12 comments)
All discussions are moderated. Please see our full comment policy for details.
Please rewrite this story to eliminate all the passive voice euphemisms and reflect the true carnage of what is happening.
Instead of 'Budget cuts across the board', try 'University eviscerates own budget'
Instead of 'Queen’s will be experiencing a 15 per cent budget cut over the next three academic years.', try 'The University is bludgeoning its quality, cutting 15%, equivalent to 3 out of every 20 positions'
Instead of 'will be applied' try 'is ramming through'.
People might start to notice.
I find this interesting, considering the number of new courses that have been added in the past few years. Instead of a handful of quality courses, we will now have a large array of under-funded, substandard courses.
All around, a truly brilliant move. Bravo to all those involved.
uhhh, do you think it might have anything to do with the MASSIVE amount of construction going on around the campus. Who was the genius who decided to pilot so many major construction projects within a 5 year time frame.
I'm not sure to what extent the University is permitted to do so, but perhaps it's time to re-evaluate tuition. I realize we're getting screwed already - that the provincial and federal gov'ts don't hold up their end of the funding, but in the end it OUR degrees.
I think most students at Queen's can afford a 10% hike or so. The university should consider raising tuition to cover the gap, as long as they expand financial aid so that those who can't pay for it don't fall through the cracks of debt.
I'm here for an education, and NOTHING else. How about this: instead of cutting back faculty and department budgets (which are taken up almost entirely by prof's salaries, so less $$ = less profs = bigger classes OR not getting into classes you want), let's instead cut:
- 100% of the funding for athletics
- 100% of the funding for anything related to 'school spirit'
First off, these cuts are from the Province, Queen's doesn't have ANY say whatsoever in the magnitude, which is why other schools are in the exact same boat.
Instead of directing anger at the school, do it at the provincial government. Everyone is crapping bricks right now due to the economy, but the Province holds the purse strings.
On that note, I'd like to ask the Province: how the hell are some departments, which are already extraordinarily efficient in terms of non-faculty staff, going to cope with 15% of cuts when payroll takes up >90% of the budget? Make a long term financial plan for Universities so that they can plan accordingly, don't shuffle on every year onto a new course of action.
J, who writes: "'m here for an education, and NOTHING else", seems to be letting classes get in the way of their education, and that's too bad.
Pity, though, that the university seems to have no real plan (and will, thus, make a mess); comments about saving money by forcing employees to use a travel agency are just not credible and really points to poor management of tax-payer and student dollars.
... and yet we have a quarter of a billion dollars (and rising) for a fancy new gym to boost queens ranking in macleans magazine's university shopping guide.
and I hear the TAs union want a rise in paycheck. way to go
To the student who suggested an increase in tuition - there is a provincial framework for tuition fee regulation in nearly all programs, and the university also tries to stay within a competitive range of similar programs at other universities so that it can attract top-quality students. If you check out the latest Senate agenda, you will notice that Queen's has in fact revised its original plans for 2009-2010 tuition to maximize tuition fee increases wherever possible.
If you will permit me a bit of ideological commentary on that, I will note that much of the increase will come from a change from sustained to increased fees for international students, who consistently state inability to plan for future tuition as one of their frustrations in paying to attend Queen's. Note also that the revised tuition plan increases tuition by 4.8% across the university, just under the provincial maximum of 5%, and that it will, in fact, bring in additional revenue of under $1 million.
I don't understand why the University is funding "FREE" parking and a "FREE" shuttle to and from west campus. I think it is time to reconsider the "FREE" service and instead create a parking pass system (for a nominal daily or monthly fee). Current "ON" campus parking permits cost over $64.00 per month.....what do you get... the privilege of searching for parking spots that are almost impossible to find. I have been forced to use the free shuttle while still paying for the parking pass.... If the University wants to save a few bucks.........cancel the free Shuttle service and parking on West campus.....If the University wants to make a few bucks......charge a user fee.
Just my thoughts.
Journal comments policy
The comments on this website do not represent the views or opinions of the Queen's Journal, but of the comment-writer alone. Libelous comments and unsubstantiated allegations will not be printed, nor will comments that discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, nationality, citizenship, gender, religion, sexual orientation, age, marital status or mental or physical ability. All comments are moderated, and may take up to 24 hours to be posted on this site barring any unforeseen circumstances. The Journal reserves the right to refrain from publishing comments. Comments are not edited for grammar or spelling, or for vulgar language outside of the above restrictions. The Journal respects your privacy. By posting your comments in our feedback forum you give us permission to post and publish your name, city and comments on the Journal website. All submissions must contain the email address of the comment-writer. Thank you for your co-operation.

Kingston
November 21, 2008 at 10:48 a.m.
In a single week, it has come out that Queen's has canceled Homecoming, a major source of revenue, is spending money to spy on its students conversations and will now cut departmental funding by 15% over 3 years. What is it that Queen's stands for now? It is not alumni, it is not freedom of speech, and now it doesn't seam like quality of education. I will still recommend Queen's to grade 12s I know, I will still tell my friends and family over the break that I love going to school here, but I will do so less enthusiastically.