Canadian Universities get a failing grade on free speech

Image by: Jashan Dua

Students lose when we limit controversial discussions on campus.

More and more, students are actively choosing to conceal their real political beliefs in the university classroom, leaving students to wonder, what’s the purpose of their degree if not for challenging their thoughts and perceptions.

A staggering number of students across Canada participate in self-censorship on university campuses. According to the Aristotle Foundation for Public Policy, nearly 50 per cent of university students across Canada, and nearly 85 per cent of students who identify as very conservative, expressed reluctance to reveal their opinions on controversial political issues, with fear of being penalized with lower grades.

However, when speaking on non-controversial issues, 93.4 per cent of university students feel comfortable speaking up.

There’s no real value in a university education if it doesn’t challenge our thoughts and preconceptions about contentious topics in the world around us.

While right-wing students typically have more reservations about sharing their perspectives on controversial political issues, the problem transcends party lines, with 47 per cent of left-wing students reporting that they’re concerned about expressing their views on campus, fearing they could be deemed offensive.

These statistics highlight that Canadian university students are suffering from self-censorship.  When students aren’t given the space to share and challenge their perspectives, universities become a place of censorship rather than higher knowledge.

Unease doesn’t end with students; professors are feeling the pressure too. 44 per cent of right-leaning professors express concern about their political values being known and would worry that they would face negative consequences if colleges, students or others on campus learned their political opinions.

The climate of self-censorship created in the classroom with both students and faculty raises larger concerns about what intellectual thoughts are being cultivated at universities. When we foster confirmation bias in a learning environment, we risk hindering the intellectual development of students who will one day be the leaders in our society, creating a polarizing and less tolerant environment.

Universities across the country can no longer sit idly as students stifle their opinions, while claiming to be transformative, educational institutions. Students are leaving campus with a degree and perfect grades, but never learning to defend an argument or their personal values, failing to prepare them for a world of disagreement.

Universities should be working to bring more partisan speakers from diverse political backgrounds to campus, as well as educating Teaching Assistants on how to accommodate different perspectives and create a welcoming environment.

Canadian students deserve concrete action from university leaders to address increased self-censorship on campus. Otherwise, they risk suppressing a diversity of perspectives—because a university without disagreement isn’t a university, but an echo-chamber.

Lauren is a third-year politics student and one of The Journal’s Features Editors

Tags

Campus, Censorship, free speech, University

All final editorial decisions are made by the Editor(s) in Chief and/or the Managing Editor. Authors should not be contacted, targeted, or harassed under any circumstances. If you have any grievances with this article, please direct your comments to journal_editors@ams.queensu.ca.

Comments (4)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to content