The Trump administration’s latest attack on migrant rights by the considering suspending habeas corpus is both cruel and constitutionally unprecedented.
As of early May, the Trump administration announced that they are “actively looking at” suspending habeas corpus—the right to a fair trial—for detained migrants. The White House’s Deputy and Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, repeatedly used the justification that the United States is facing an invasion by immigrants.
According to The New York Times, Habeas corpus has only been suspended four times in the United States’ history, most recently following the attack on Pearl Harbour in ’41. The contrast in events warranting the use of the suspension illustrates the current US administration’s exaggeration of the ‘immigrant threat’, one with potentially harmful consequences.
Evident from the slew of executive orders placed during the first 100 days of his presidency, Donald Trump has no interest in abiding by the Constitution. What’s most surprising is the public’s confusion over Trump simply following through on his campaign promises. This most recent attempt at suspending another fundamental right shouldn’t come as a surprise to those who voted for a platform rooted in discrimination
and fundamentalism.
Aside from his blatant disregard for the judicial branch, Trump’s violations reflect a deeper moral failing that goes beyond Constitutional violations. Every person—regardless of citizenship status—deserves the right to a fair trial. Asylum laws exist to help all people—regardless of citizenship—to escape genocide and prosecution, a principle enshrined in the Refugee Act of 1980. Yet, these fundamental protections have been repeatedly violated by the current president.
Concerningly, attempting to suspend habeas corpus is only a drop in the bucket of what the Trump administration is capable of. Trump has been known to weaponize the interests of his party to sustain executive power, starting with his executive orders, and moving into a systemic removal of checks and balances, including removing independent agencies and granting himself spending authority. These unprecedented actions will undoubtedly have lasting effects on the legitimacy of the United States government.
Framing immigration as an invasion, rather than seeking asylum, is a racially charged argument and deeply harms the immigrant community. Racialized immigrant groups have been the target of baseless accusations from the Trump administration, fostering division and amplifying xenophobia.
The Trump administration’s attempt to suspend habeas corpus for migrants isn’t just legal overreach—it’s a moral failure. Invoking wartime powers to target vulnerable asylum seekers is both blatantly wrong and risks eroding constitutional protections and basic human rights.
Conflating asylum seekers with invaders isn’t only incorrect, but a fearmongering tactic with racial undertones. Left unchallenged, these actions risk normalizing authoritarian governance and will have long-term effects on the state of American democracy.
Tags
fair trial, immigration, Trump administration
All final editorial decisions are made by the Editor(s) in Chief and/or the Managing Editor. Authors should not be contacted, targeted, or harassed under any circumstances. If you have any grievances with this article, please direct your comments to journal_editors@ams.queensu.ca.